Reading List

GIS and Society

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014a). Do maps make geography? part 1: Redlining, planned shrinkage, and the places of decline. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 525-556. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1036

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014b). Do maps make geography? part 2: Post-katrina new orleans, post-foreclosure cleveland and neoliberal urbanism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 557-882. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1038

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014c). Do maps make geography? part 3: Reconnecting the trace. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 586-588. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1040

  • Barndt, M. (2002). A model for evaluating public participation GIS. In W. J. Craig, T. M.Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 346-356). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Brown, G.,Weber, D., & de Bie, K. (2015). Is PPGIS good enough? an empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning. Land use Policy, 43 , 228-238.doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014

  • Caquard, S. (2013). Cartography I. Progress in Human Geography, 37 (1),135-144. doi:10.1177/0309132511423796

  • Caquard, S. (2014). Cartography II. Progress in Human Geography, 38 (1),141-150. doi:10.1177/0309132513514005

  • Caquard, S. (2015). Cartography III. Progress in Human Geography, 39 (2),225-235. doi:10.1177/0309132514527039

  • Chrisman, N. R. (1998). Academic origins of GIS. In T. W. Foresman (Ed.), the history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the pioneers (pp.33-43). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Chrisman, N. R. (1999). What does ‘GIS’ mean? Transactions in GIS, 3 (2),175-186. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00014

  • Clarke, K.C., & Cloud, J. G. (2000). On the origins of analytical cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27 (3), 195-204. doi:10.1559/152304000783547821

  • Cloud, J. (2002). American cartographic transformations during the cold war. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (3), 261-282. doi:10.1559/152304002782008422

  • Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Cosgrove, D. (2008). Cultural cartography : maps and mapping in cultural geography. Annales de géographie, 660-661 (2),159. doi:10.3917/ag.660.0159

  • Craig, W.J., & Elwood, S. A. (1998). How and why community groups use maps and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 95-104. doi:10.1559/152304098782594616

  • Craig, W.J., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Crampton, J. (2002). Maps, politics, and history. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20 (6), 637-646. doi:10.1068/d2006c

  • Crampton, J. (2004). GIS and geographic governance: Reconstructing the choropleth map. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1),41-53. doi:10.3138/H066-3346-R941-6382

  • Crampton, J. W. (2002). Thinking philosophically in cartography: Toward A critical politics of mapping. Cartographic Perspectives, 41 , 4-23.doi:10.14714/CP41.561

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009a). Cartography – A field in tension? Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44 (1),1-3. doi:10.3138/carto.44.1.1

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009b). Cartography: Performative, participatory, political. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (6), 840-848. doi:10.1177/0309132508105000

  • Crampton, J. W. (2010). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Crampton, J. W., & Krygier, J. (2006). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (1), 11-33.

  • Delmelle, E. C. (2016). Mapping the DNA of urban neighborhoods: Clustering longitudinal sequences of neighborhood socioeconomic change. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106 (1), 36. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1758184933

  • Dennis, S.F. (2006). Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2039-2054. doi:10.1068/a3861

  • Dobson, J.E. (2015). Geographic information systems (GIS): GIS as an institutional revolution. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 492-495). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Dodge, M. (2017). Cartography I: Mapping deeply, mapping the past. Progress in Human Geography, 41 (1), 89-98. doi:10.1177/0309132516656431

  • Dodge, M. (2018). Mapping II: News media mapping, new mediated geovisualities, mapping and verticality. Progress in Human Geography, 42 (6), 949-958. doi:10.1177/0309132517733086

  • Dodge, M.,Kitchin, R., & Perkins, C. (Eds.). (2009). Rethinking maps: New frontiers in cartographic theory. London: Routledge.

  • Dunn, C.E. (2007). Participatory GIS — a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31 (5), 616-637. doi:10.1177/0309132507081493

  • Edney, M. (1996). Theory and the history of cartography. Imago Mundi, 48 (1),185-191. doi:10.1080/03085699608592841

  • Edney, M. (2005). The origins and development of J. B. harley’s cartographic theories. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Edney, M.H. (2015). Cartography and its discontents. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 50 (1),9-13. doi:10.3138/carto.50.1.02

  • Elwood, S. (2006a). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (2), 323-341.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x

  • Elwood, S. (2006b). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58 (2), 197-208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x

  • Elwood, S. (2011). Participatory approaches in GIS and society research: Foundations, practices, and future directions. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R.McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp.381-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Elwood, S., & Leitner, H. (2003). GIS and spatial knowledge production for neighborhood revitalization: Negotiating state priorities and neighborhood visions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25 (2), 139-157. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00003

  • Elwood, S., Schuurman, N., & Wilson, M. W. (2011). Critical GIS. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp.87-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Elwood, S.A. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34 (5), 905-922. doi:10.1068/a34117

  • Fish, C., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Geographic information systems (GIS): GIS as a tool for map production. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 504-510). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Foresman, T. W. (1998). GIS early years and the threads of evolution. In T. W. Foresman(Ed.), The history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the pioneers (pp. 3-17). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Ghose, R. (2001). Use of information technology for community empowerment: Transforming geographic information systems into community information systems. Transactions In GIS, 5 (2), 141-163. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00073

  • Ghose, R. (2003). Community participation, spatial knowledge production, and GIS use in inner-city revitalization. Journal of Urban Technology, 10 (1),39-60. doi:10.1080/1063073032000086326

  • Ghose, R. (2011). Politics and power in participation for GIS use for community decision making. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 423-438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1992). Geographical information science. International Journal Of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (1), 31-45.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2009a). Geographic information systems and science: Today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS, 15 (1), 3-9. doi:10.1080/19475680903250715

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2009b). NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal Of Location Based Services, 3 (2), 82-96. doi:10.1080/17489720902950374

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2015). Two decades on: Critical GIScience since 1993. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1), 3-11.doi:10.1111/cag.12117

  • Graham, M. (2010). Neogeography and the palipsests of place: Web 2.0 and the construction of a virtual earth. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101 (4), 422-436.

  • Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment And Planning A, 45 (1), 55-69. doi:10.1068/a45184

  • Halpern, O. (2015). Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Hammel, D.J., & Wyly, E. K. (1996). A model for identifying gentrified areas with census data. Urban Geography, 17 (3), 248-268.doi:10.2747/0272-3638.17.3.248

  • Harley, J.B. (2001). In Laxton P. (Ed.), The new nature of maps: Essays in the history of cartography. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Harvey, F. (2000). The social construction of geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 711-713. doi:10.1080/136588100750022741

  • Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30 (9), 1683-1694. doi:10.1068/a301683

  • Heffernan, M. (2002). The politics of the map in the early twentieth century. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (3), 207-226. doi:10.1559/152304002782008512

  • Huck, J.J., Whyatt, J. D., & Coulton, P. (2014). Spray can: A PPGIS for capturing imprecise notions of place. Applied Geography, 55 , 229-237.doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.007

  • Janelle, D. G., & Goodchild, M. F. (2011). Concepts, principles, tools, and challenges in spatially integrated social science. In T. L. Nyerges, H.Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 27-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Jankowski, P. (2011). Designing public participation geographic information systems. In T.L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 347-360). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Jung, J., & Elwood, S. (2010). Extending the qualitative capabilities of GIS: Computer-aided qualitative GIS. Transactions in GIS, 14 (1),63-87. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2009.01182.x

  • Kavouras, M., & Kolka, M. (2011). Geographic ontologies and society. In T. L.Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 46-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization.Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2021-2037. doi:10.1068/a37327

  • Kurgan, L. (2013). Close up at a distance: Mapping, technology, and politics. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.

  • Leszczynski, A. (2014). On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104 (1), 60-79. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.846159

  • Leszczynski, A., & Elwood, S. (2015). Feminist geographies of new spatial media. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1), 12-28.doi:10.1111/cag.12093

  • Lin, W. (2012). When web 2.0 meets public participation GIS (PPGIS): VGI and spaces of participatory mapping in china. In D. Sui, S. Elwood & M. Goodchild(Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information in theory and practice (pp. 83-103). London: Springer.

  • Logan, J.R., Xu, Z., & Stults, B. J. (2014). Interpolating U.S. decennial census tract data from as early as 1970 to 2010: A longitudinal tract database. The Professional Geographer, 66 (3), 412-420.doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.905156

  • Maantay, J., & Ziegler, J. (2009). GIS for the urban environment. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.

  • Marble, D.F. (2015). Geographic information systems (GIS): Computational geography as a new modality. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 488-492). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Martin, D. (1991). Geographic information systems and their socioeconomic applications. Andover: Capman and Hall.

  • McCall, M.K., Martinez Martin, J., & Verplanke, J. J. (2015). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: Learning from PGIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14 (3), 791-826.

  • Mennis, J., Mason, M. J., & Cao, Y. (2013). Qualitative GIS and the visualization of narrative activity space data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science : IJGIS, 27 (2), 267-291.doi:10.1080/13658816.2012.678362

  • Miller, H.J. (2017). Geographic information science I: Geographic information observatories and opportunistic GIScience. Progress in Human Geography, 41 (4),489-500. doi:10.1177/0309132517710741

  • Miller, H.J. (2018). Geographic information science II: Mesogeography: Social physics,GIScience and the quest for geographic knowledge. Progress in Human Geography, 42 (4), 600-609. doi:10.1177/0309132517712154

  • Miller, H.J. (in press). Geographic information science III: Why faster geographic information is not always smarter. Progress in Human Geography, doi:10.1177/0309132518799596

  • Mitchell, A. (2009). The esri guide to GIS analysis volume 2: Spatial measurements and statistics. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (1985). Technological transition in cartography. Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (1995). Drawing the line: Tales of maps and cartocontroversy. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

  • Monmonier, M. (1996). How to lie with maps (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2002). Spying with maps: Surveillance technologies and the future of privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2007). Cartography: The multidisciplinary pluralism of cartographic art,geospatial technology, and empirical scholarship. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (3), 371-379. doi:10.1177/0309132507077089

  • Monmonier, M. (2010). No dig, no fly, no go: How maps restrict and control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2017). Patents and cartographic inventions: A new perspective for map history. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Monmonier, M. (2018). How to lie with maps (3rd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Monmonier, M. (Ed.). (2015). The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • NCGIA. (1996). GIS and society: The social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS — scientific report for the initiative 19 specialist meeting. (96-7). Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bw2d2rw

  • Nyerges, T. L., Couclelis, H., & McMaster, R. (Eds.). (2011). The sage handbook of GIS and society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Nyerges, T. L., McMaster, R., & Couclelis, H. (2011). Geographic information systems and society: A twenty year research perspective. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp.3-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446201046.n1

  • Obermeyer, N. J. (1998). The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 65-66. doi:10.1559/152304098782594599

  • Openshaw, S. (1991). Commentary: A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put humpty-dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A, 23 (5), 621-628. doi:10.1068/a230621

  • Openshaw, S. (1992). Commentary: Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A reply. Environment and Planning A, 24 (4), 463-466.

  • Overton, M., & Taylor, P. J. (1991). Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A preemptive strike? Environment and Planning A, 23 (8),1087-1094.

  • Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58 (4),470-484. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x

  • Pavlovskaya, M. (2006). Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2003-2020. doi:10.1068/a37326

  • Peluso, N.L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter-mapping forest territories in kalimantan, indonesia. Antipode, 27 (4),383-406. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x

  • Perkins, C. (2003). Cartography: Mapping theory. Progress in Human Geography, 27 (3), 341-351. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph430pr

  • Perkins, D. D., Larsen, C., & Brown, B. B. (2009). Mapping urban revitalization: Using GIS spatial analysis to evaluate a new housing policy. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 37 (1), 48-65. doi:10.1080/10852350802498698

  • Pickles, J. (1991). Geography, GIS and the surveillant society. Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 14 , 80-91.

  • Pickles, J. (2004). A history of spaces: Cartographic reason, mapping and the geo-coded world. London: Routledge.

  • Radil, S.M., & Jiao, J. (2016). Public participatory GIS and the geography of inclusion. The Professional Geographer, 68 (2), 202-210.doi:10.1080/00330124.2015.1054750

  • Ramasubramanian, L. (2011). PPGIS implementation and the transformation of US planning practice. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 400-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16 (2),15-26.

  • Schuurman, N. (1999). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 36 (4), 11-22. doi:10.3138/U807-35K0-560M-0151

  • Schuurman, N. (2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (4), 726-739.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00513.x

  • Schuurman, N. (2009). The new brave new world: Geography, GIS, and the emergence of ubiquitous mapping and data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (4), 571-572. doi:10.1068/d3809

  • Schuurman, N. (2015). What is alt.gis? introduction to the special issue. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),1-2. doi:10.1111/cag.12163

  • Sheppard, E. (2005). Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 5-21. doi:10.3138/GH27-1847-QP71-7TP7

  • Sieber, R. (2000). GIS implementation in the grassroots. URISA Journal, 12 (1),15-29.

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491-507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x

  • Sieber, R.E. (2000). Conforming (to) the opposition: The social construction of geographical information systems in social movements. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 775-793. doi:10.1080/136588100750022787

  • Smith, N. (1992). History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography, 16 (2), 257-271. doi:10.1177/030913259201600208

  • Sui, D. Z. (2015). Alternative GIS (alt.gis) and the six senses of the new mind: Isalt.gis transforming GIS into a liberation technology? In F. Harvey, & Y.Leung (Eds.), Advances in spatial data handling and analysis: Select papers from the 16th IGU spatial data handling symposium (pp. 1-11).New York: Springer.

  • Sui, D., & Goodchild, M. (2011). The convergence of GIS and social media: Challenges for GIScience. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (11), 1737-1748. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.604636

  • Sui, D.,Elwood, S., & Goodchild, M. (Eds.). (2012). Crowd sourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. New York: Springer.

  • Taylor, P.J. (1990). Editorial comment GKS. Political Geography Quarterly, 9 (3),211-212. doi:10.1016/0260-9827(90)90023-4

  • Thomas, C., & Humenik-Sappington, N. (2009). GIS for decision support and public policy making. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

  • Thomas, M.R. (2002). A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Land scape and Urban Planning, 58 (1), 7-23. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00229-8

  • Toscano, A., & Kinkle, J. (2015). Cartographies of the absolute. Washington, DC: Zero Books.

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? from vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4), 161-171. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1

  • Weaver, R.C., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2013). Spatial analysis of urban decline: The geography of blight. Applied Geography, 40 , 61-70. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622813000386

  • Weiner, D., Harris, T. M., & Craig, W. J. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner(Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp.3-16). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Wilson, M.W. (2014). Map the trace. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 583-585. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1039

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015a). New lines? enacting a social history of GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),29-34. doi:10.1111/cag.12118

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015b). Paying attention, digital media, and community-based critical GIS. Cultural Geographies, 22 (1), 177-192. doi:10.1177/1474474014539249

  • Wilson, M.W. (2017). New lines: Critical GIS and trouble of the map. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Wilson, M.W., & Graham, M. (2013). Situating neogeography: Guest editorial. Environment and Planning A, 45 (1), 3-9. doi:10.1068/a44482

  • Wise, S., & Ma, J. (1998). Exploratory spatial data analysis in a geographic information system environment. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (the Statistician), 47 (3), 457-469. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2988627

  • Wridt, P. (2010). A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (1), 129-147. doi:10.1068/b35002

  • Wright, D.J., Duncan, S. L., & Lach, D. (2009). Social power and GIS technology: A review and assessment of approaches for natural resource management. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99 (2), 254-272. doi:10.1080/00045600802686299

  • Wright, D.J., Goodchild, M. F., & Proctor, J. D. (1997). GIS: Tool or science? demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as “tool” versus “science”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (2), 346-362. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564374

  • Wyly, E.K., & Hammel, D. J. (1999). Islands of decay in seas of renewal: Housing policy and the resurgence of gentrification. Housing Policy Debate, 10 (4), 711-771. doi:10.1080/10511482.1999.9521348

PPGIS/PGIS

  • Aberley, D., & Sieber, R. (2002). Public participation GIS (PPGIS) guiding principles Integrated Approaches to Participatory Development (iapad).Retrieved from http://www.iapad.org/ppgis_principles.htm

  • Aggett, G., & McColl, C. (2006). Evaluating decision support systems for PPGIS applications. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 33 (1),77-92. doi:10.1559/152304006777323163

  • Aitken, S.C. (2002). Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS.In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 357-366).London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Al-Kodmany, K. (2000a). Extending geographic information systems to meet neighborhood planning needs: The case of three Chicago communities. URISA Journal, 12 (3), 19-37.

  • Al-Kodmany, K. (2000b). Public participation: Technology and democracy. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 53(4), 220-228. doi:10.1162/104648800564635

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225

  • Balram, S., & Dragicevic, S. (2006). Collaborative geographic information systems. Hershey, PA: Idea Group. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-845-1

  • Barndt, M. (1998). Public participation GIS—Barriers to implementation. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25 (2), 105-112. doi:10.1559/152304098782594607

  • Barndt, M. (2002). A model for evaluating public participation GIS. In W. J. Craig, T. M.Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 346-356). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Baum, H.S. (2001). How shall we evaluate community initiatives? Journal of the American Planning Association, 67 (2), 147-157. doi:10.1080/01944360108976225

  • Bednarz, S. W., Bettis, N. C., Boehm, R. G., De Souza, A. R., Downs, R. M., Marran, J.F., . . . Salter, C. L. (1994). Geography for life: National geography standards, 1994. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Research & Exploration.

  • Bond, C. (2002). The cherokee nation and tribal uses of GIS. InW. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 283-293).London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Brown, G., & Kyttä, M. (2014). Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Applied Geography, 46 , 122-136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004

  • Brown, G.,Weber, D., & de Bie, K. (2015). Is PPGIS good enough? an empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning. Land use Policy, 43 , 228-238.doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.014

  • Burby, R.J. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69 (1), 33-49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292

  • Caquard, S. (2003). Internet, maps and public participation: Contemporary limits and possibilities. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp.345-357). New York: Elsevier.

  • Carsjens, G. J., & Ligtenberg, A. (2007). A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80 , 72-83.

  • Carver, S. (2001). (2001). Participation and geographical information: A position paper.Paper presented at the ESF-NSF Workshop on Access to geographic information and Participatory Approaches using Geographic Information, Spoleto,Italy. Retrieved from http://www.shef.ac.uk/~scgisa/spoleto/workshop.htm

  • Carver, S. (2003). The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century. URISA Journal, 15 (APAI), 61-71.

  • Casey, L., & Pederson, T. (2002). Mapping philadelphia’s neighborhoods. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 383). London:Taylor & Francis.

  • Clark, M.J. (1998). GIS—Democracy or delusion? Environment and Planning A, 30 (2), 303-316. doi:10.1068/a300303

  • Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Corbett, J. M., & Keller, C. P. (2005). An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems(PGIS).Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information And Geovisualization, 40 (4), 91-102. doi:10.3138/J590-6354-P38V-4269

  • Cornwall, Andrea and Rachel Jewkes. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41 (12), 1667-1676. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S

  • Craglia, M., & Onsrud, H. (2003). Workshop on access to geographic information and participatory approaches in using geographic information. URISA Journal, 15 (APA II), 9-15.

  • Craig, W.J. (2005). White knights of spatial data infrastructure: The role and motivation of key individuals. URISA Journal, 16 (2), 5-13.

  • Craig, W.J., & Elwood, S. A. (1998). How and why community groups use maps and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 95-104. doi:10.1559/152304098782594616

  • Craig, W.J., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009). Cartography: Performative, participatory, political. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (6), 840-848. doi:10.1177/0309132508105000

  • Curry, M.R. (1999). On the possibility of democracy in a geocoded world. Social Science Computer Review, 17 (10), 10-15. doi:10.1177/089443939901700102

  • Dangermond, J. (2002). Mutualism in strengthening GIS technologies and democratic principles: Perspectives from a GIS software vendor. In W. J. Craig, T. M.Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 297-308). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Dennis, S.F. (2006). Prospects for qualitative GIS at the intersection of youth development and participatory urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2039-2054. doi:10.1068/a3861

  • Drew, C.H. (2003). Transparency – considerations for PPGIS research and development. URISA Journal, 15 (APA I), 73-78.

  • Drummond, W. J., & French, S. P. (2008). The future of GIS in planning: Converging technologies and diverging interests. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74 (2), 161-174. doi:10.1080/01944360801982146

  • Dunn, C.E. (2007a). Participatory GIS — a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31 (5), 616-637. doi:10.1177/0309132507081493

  • Dunn, C.E. (2007b). Participatory GIS-a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31 (5), 616-637. doi:10.1177/0309132507081493

  • Ellis, C.D., Quiroga, C., Shin, S., & Pina, R. J. (2003). GIS and human-centered systems design: Using ethnographic data collection and analysis methods to design a utility permitting support system. URISA Journal, 15 (2),5-22.

  • Elwood, S. (2002). The impacts of GIS use for neighborhood revitalization in Minneapolis.In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 77-88). London:Taylor and Francis.

  • Elwood, S. (2006a). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (2), 323-341.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x

  • Elwood, S. (2006b). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 693-708. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x

  • Elwood, S. (2006c). Negotiating knowledge production: The everyday inclusions, exclusions, and contradictions of participatory GIS research. The Professional Geographer, 58 (2), 197-208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00526.x

  • Elwood, S. (2008a). Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures:Challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22 (1), 71-90. doi:10.1080/13658810701348971

  • Elwood, S. (2008b). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),173-183. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9186-0

  • Elwood, S. (2009). Integrating participatory action research and GIS education:Negotiating methodologies, politics and technologies. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33 (1), 51-65. doi:10.1080/03098260802276565

  • Elwood, S. (2011). Participatory approaches in GIS and society research: Foundations, practices, and future directions. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R.McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp.381-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2001). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 38 (3-4), 19-33. doi:10.3138/R411-50G8-1777-2120

  • Elwood, S., & Leitner, H. (1998). GIS and community-based planning: Exploring the diversity of neighborhood perspectives and needs. Cartography and geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 77-88. doi:10.1559/152304098782594553

  • Elwood, S., & Leitner, H. (2003). GIS and spatial knowledge production for neighborhood revitalization: Negotiating state priorities and neighborhood visions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25 (2), 139-157. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00003

  • Elwood, S., & Mitchell, K. (2012). Mapping children’s politics: Spatial stories,dialogic relations and political formation. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 94 (1), 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2012.00392.x

  • Elwood, S.A. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34 (5), 905-922. doi:10.1068/a34117

  • Erik deMan, W. H. (2003). Cultural and institutional conditions for using geographic information; access and participation. URISA Journal, 15 (APAI), 29-33.

  • Esnard, A., Gelobter, M., & Morales, X. (2004). Environmental justice, GIS, and pedagogy. Cartographica, 38 (4),53-61. doi:10.3138/3267-H048-1409-7518

  • Ethridge, M. E. (1982). The policy impact of citizen participation procedures: A comparative state study. American Politics Quarterly, 10 (4),489-509. doi:10.1177/004478082010004006

  • Geertman, S. (2002). Participatory planning and GIS: A PSS to bridge the gap. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (1), 21-35. doi:10.1068/b2760

  • Ghose, R. (2001). Use of information technology for community empowerment: Transforming geographic information systems into community information systems. Transactions In GIS, 5 (2), 141-163. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00073

  • Ghose, R. (2003). Community participation, spatial knowledge production, and GIS use in inner-city revitalization. Journal of Urban Technology, 10 (1),39-60. doi:10.1080/1063073032000086326

  • Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39 (8), 1961-1980. doi:10.1068/a38247

  • Ghose, R. (2011). Politics and power in participation for GIS use for community decision making. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 423-438). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Ghose, R., & Huxhold, W. E. (2001). Role of local contextual factors in building public participation GIS: The milwaukee experience. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (3), 195-208. doi:10.1559/152304001782153017

  • Ghose, R., & Welcenbach, T. (2018). “Power to the people”: Contesting urban poverty and power inequities through open GIS. The Canadian Geographer / LeGéographe Canadien, 62 (1), 67-80. doi:10.1111/cag.12442

  • Hansen, H.S., & Reinau, K. H. (2006). (2006). Who are the citizens in public participation GIS. Paper presented at the UDMS ’06 : 25th Urban Data Management Symposium, Aalborg,Denmark. 10.36.

  • Harris, T., & Weiner, D. (1998). Empowerment, marginalization, and “community-integrated” GIS. Cartography and geographic information Science, 25 (2), 67-76. doi:10.1559/152304098782594580

  • Harris, T.M., Weiner, D., Warner, T. A., & Levin, R. (1995). Pursuing social goals through participatory geographic information systems. In J. Pickles(Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 196-222). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Henry-Nickie, M., Kurban, H., Green, R. D., & Phoenix, J. A. (2008). Leveling the playing field: Enabling community-based organizations to utilize geographic information systems for effective advocacy. URISA Journal, 20 (2), 33.

  • Howard, D. (1998). (1998). Geographic information technologies and community planning:Spatial empowerment and public participation. Paper presented at the ProjectVarenius Specialist Meeting on Empowerment, Marginalization, and Public Participation GIS, Retrieved from http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/howard.html

  • Huck, J.J., Whyatt, J. D., & Coulton, P. (2014). Spray can: A PPGIS for capturing imprecise notions of place. Applied Geography, 55 , 229-237.doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.007

  • Jankowski, P. (1995). Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 9 (3), 251-273. doi:10.1080/02693799508902036

  • Jankowski, P. (2011). Designing public participation geographic information systems. In T.L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 347-360). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Jankowski, P., & Milosz Stasik. (1997). Spatial understanding and decision support system: A prototype for public GIS. Transactions in GIS, 2 (1),73-84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.1997.tb00006.x

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). Geographic information systems for group decision making. London: Taylor & Francis.

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2001). GIS-supported collaborative decision making:Results of an experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91 (1), 48-70. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00233

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. (2003). Toward a framework for research on geographic information-supported participatory decision-making. URISA Journal, 15 (APA I), 9-17.

  • Jankowski, P., & Nyerges, T. L. (2001b). Geographic information systems for group decision making: Towards a participatory, geographic information science. London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Jankowski, P., & Richard, L. (1994). Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in a spatial decision support system for route selection. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 21 (3),323-340.

  • Jankowski, P., & Stasik, M. (1997). Spatial understanding and decision support system:A prototype for public GIS. Transactions in GIS, 2 (1), 73-84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.1997.tb00006.x

  • Jankowski, P., & Stasik, M. (2001). A map browser for an internet-based GIS data repository. Transactions in GIS, 5 (1), 5-18. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00064

  • Jankowski, P., Andrienko, N., & Andrienko, G. (2001). Map-centred exploratory approach to multiple criteria spatial decision making. International Journal of geographical Information Science, 15 (2), 101-127. doi:10.1080/13658810010005525

  • Jankowski, P., Ramsey, K., Robischon, S., Tuthill, D., & Nyerges, T. (2006). Design considerations and evaluation of a collaborative, spatio-temporal decision support system. Transactions in GIS, 10 (3), 335-354. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01001.x

  • Joerin, F., & Nembrini, A. (2005). Post-experiment evaluation of the use of geographic information in a public participatory process. URISA Journal, 17 (1), 15-26.

  • Joffe, B. (2005). Ten ways to support GIS without selling data. URISA Journal, 16 (2), 27-33.

  • Kellogg, W. A. (1999). From the field: Observations on using GIS to develop a neighborhood environmental information system for community-based organizations. URISA Journal, 11 (1), 15-32.

  • Kirschenbaum, J., & Russ, L. (2002). Community mapping: Using geographic data for neighborhood revitalization. (). Oakland: PolicyLink. Retrieved from http://www.policylink.org/pdfs/Mapping.pdf

  • Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization.Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2021-2037. doi:10.1068/a37327

  • Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2009). Grounded visualization and scale: A recursive analysis of community spaces. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed-methods approach (pp. 95-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Krygier, J. B. (2002). A praxis of public participation GIS and visualization. In W. J.Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 330-341). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Kwaku Kyem, P. A. (2001). Power, participation, and inflexible institutions: An examination of the challenges to community empowerment in participatory GIS applications. Cartographica, 38 (3-4), 5-18. doi:10.3138/2J31-4648-6P62-6P78

  • Kwan, M. (2002). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (4), 645-661. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00309

  • Laituri, M. (2002). Ensuring access to GIS for marginal societies. In W. J. Craig, T. M.Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 270-282). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Laituri, M. (2003). The issue of access: An assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science. URISA Journal, 15 (2),25-32.

  • Leitner, H., Elwood, S. A., Sheppard, E., McMaster, S., & McMaster, R. B. (2000).Modes of GIS provision and their appropriateness for neighborhood organizations: Examples from minneapolis and st. paul minnesota. URISA Journal, 12 (4), 43-56.

  • Leitner, H., McMaster, R. B., Elwood, S., McMaster, S., & Sheppard, E. (2002).Models for making GIS available to community organizations: Dimensions of difference and appropriateness. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner(Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp.383). London: Taylor & Francis.

  • Lin, W. (2012). When web 2.0 meets public participation GIS (PPGIS): VGI and spaces of participatory mapping in china. In D. Sui, S. Elwood & M. Goodchild(Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information in theory and practice (pp. 83-103). London: Springer.

  • Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: Center for International Education.

  • McCall, M.K. (2003). Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: A review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat International, 27 (4), 549-573. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(03)00005-5

  • McCall, M.K. (2004a). (2004a). Can participatory-GIS strengthen local-level spatial planning? suggestions for better practice. Paper presented at the Gisdeco, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/1rcltd2pck3y7lf7/fulltext.pdf

  • McCall, M.K. (2004b). Map making bottom-up by urban and rural communities: Can GI really be participatory. GIM International, 18 (10), 42-45.

  • McCall, M.K. (2006). Precision for whom? mapping ambiguity and certainty in (participatory) GIS. Participatory Learning and Action, 54 (1), 114-119.

  • McCall, M.K., Martinez Martin, J., & Verplanke, J. J. (2015). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: Learning from PGIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14 (3), 791-826.

  • McHaffie, P. H. (1995). Manufacturing metaphors: Public cartography, the market, and democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 113-129). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Merrick, M. (2003). Reflections on PPGIS: A view from the trenches. URISA Journal, 15 (2), 33-39.

  • Mohammad, R. A. (2003). Some challenges of integrating spatial and non-spatial data sets using a geographical information system. Management information systems, 10 , 171-178. doi:10.1002/itdj.1590100304

  • Myers, J.A., Martin, M., & Ghose, R. (1995). GIS and neighborhood planning: A model for revitalizing communities. URISA Journal, 7 (2), 63-67.

  • Niles, S., & Hanson, S. (2003). A new era of accessibility? URISA Journal, 15 (APA I), 35-49.

  • Nyerges, T. L., Barndt, M., & Brooks, K. (1996). (1996). Public participation geographic information systems. Paper presented at the AutoCarto 13, Seattle, WA.

  • Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., & Drew, C. (2002a). Data-gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (1),1-22. doi:10.1080/13658810110075987

  • Nyerges, T., Jankowski, P., & Drew, C. (2002b). Data-gathering strategies for social-behavioural research about participatory geographical information system use. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 16 (1),1-22. doi:10.1080/13658810110075987

  • O’Brien, J., & Field, K. (2012). Mapping social network interactions. In M. Peterson(Ed.), Online maps with APIs and web services (pp. 241-263).Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2002). Community-based participatory research as atool to advance environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110 (S2), 155-159. doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s2155

  • Obermeyer, N. J. (1998). The evolution of public participation GIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 65-66. doi:10.1559/152304098782594599

  • Onsrud, H. (2003). Introduction to the special issue on access and participatory approaches in using geographic information. URISA Journal, 15 (APAI), 5-7.

  • Park, P. (1993). What is participatory research? A theoretical and methodological perspective. In P. Park, M. Brydon-Miller, B. Hall & T. Jackson(Eds.), Voices of change: Participatory research in the united states and canada (). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

  • Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58 (4),470-484. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2006.00583.x

  • Perkins, D. D., Larsen, C., & Brown, B. B. (2009). Mapping urban revitalization: Using GIS spatial analysis to evaluate a new housing policy. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 37 (1), 48-65. doi:10.1080/10852350802498698

  • Radil, S.M., & Jiao, J. (2016). Public participatory GIS and the geography of inclusion. The Professional Geographer, 68 (2), 202-210.doi:10.1080/00330124.2015.1054750

  • Ramasubramanian, L. (2011). PPGIS implementation and the transformation of US planning practice. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 400-422). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Rambaldi, G. (2005). Who owns the map legend? URISA Journal, 17 (1),5-13.

  • Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M., & Fox, J. (2006). Practical ethics for PGI Spractitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers. Participatory Learning and Action, 54 (1), 106-113.

  • Rambaldi, G., Kyem, P. A. K., McCall, M., & Weiner, D. (2006). Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Ejisdc, 25 (1),1-9.

  • Ramsey, K. (2008). A call for agonism: GIS and the politics of collaboration. Environment and Planning A, 40 (10), 2346-2363. doi:10.1068/a4028

  • Rattray, N. (2006). A user-centered model for community-based web-GIS. URISA Journal, 18 (2), 25-34.

  • Rinner, C. (2001). Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (6), 847-863. doi:10.1068/b2748t

  • Rob, M. A. (2003). Some challenges of integrating spatial and non-spatial datasets using a geographical information system. Information Technology for Development, 10 , 171-178.

  • Robinson, J. A., & Hawthorne, T. L. (2018). Making space for community-engaged scholarship in geography. The Professional Geographer, 70 (2),277-283. doi:10.1080/00330124.2017.1366775

  • Robinson, J. A., Block, D., & Rees, A. (2017). Community geography: Addressing barriers in public participation GIS. The Cartographic Journal, 54 (1),5-13. doi:10.1080/00087041.2016.1244322

  • Rugg, R.D. (2003). A framework for the use of geographic information in participatory community planning and development. URISA Journal, 15 (APA II),75-80.

  • Rushton, G., Elmes, G., & McMaster, R. (2000). Considerations for improving geographic information system research in public health. URISA Journal, 12 (2), 31-49.

  • Sawicki, D. S., & Craig, W. J. (1996). The democratization of data. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (4), 512-524. doi:10.1080/01944369608975715

  • Sawicki, D. S., & Peterman, D. R. (2002). Surveying the extent of PPGIS practice in the United States. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 383). London:Taylor & Francis.

  • Schlossberg, M., & Shuford, E. (2005). Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS. URISA Journal, 16 (2),15-26.

  • Schlossberg, M., & Wyss, D. (2007). Teaching by doing: PPGIS and classroom-based service learning. URISA Journal, 19 (1), 13.

  • Schuurman, N., & Kwan, M. (2004). Guest editorial: Taking a walk on the social side of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 1-3. doi:10.3138/K3J7-6171-J4K0-868J

  • Sedogo, L.G., & Groten, S. M. E. (2002). Integration of local participatory and regional planning: A GIS data aggregation procedure. GeoJournal, 56 (2),69-81. doi:10.1023/A:1022438331943

  • Seeger, C.J. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),199-213. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9184-2

  • Shiffer, M. J. (1998). Multimedia GIS for planning support and public discourse. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 25 (2), 89-94. doi:10.1559/152304098782594562

  • Sidlar, C.L., & Rinner, C. (2007). Analyzing the usability of an argumentation map asa participatory spatial decision support tool. URISA Journal, 19 (1)

  • Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 491-507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x

  • Sieber, R.E. (2000). Conforming (to) the opposition: The social construction of geographical information systems in social movements. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 775-793. doi:10.1080/136588100750022787

  • Sieber, R.E. (2001). A PPGI Science? Cartographica, 38 (4), 1-4. doi:10.3138/A410-0777-U35Q-1N44

  • Sieber, R.E. (2002). Geographic information systems in the environmental movement. In W.J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 153-172). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Sieber, R.E. (2003). Public participation geographic information systems across borders. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 47 (1), 50-61.doi:10.1111/1541-0064.02e12

  • Sieber, R.E. (2004). Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 25-39.doi:10.3138/T6U8-171M-452W-516R

  • Sieber, R.E. (2007). Spatial data access by the grassroots. Cartography and geographic Information Science, 34 (1), 47-62. doi:10.1559/152304007780279087

  • St.Martin, K. (2009). Toward a cartography of the commons: Constituting the political and economic possibilities of place. The Professional Geographer, 61 (4), 493-507. doi:10.1080/00330120903143482

  • Stonich, S. C. (1998). Information technologies, advocacy, and development: Resistance and backlash to industrial shrimp farming. Cartography and geographic information Science, 25 (2), 113-122. doi:10.1559/152304098782594544

  • Sui, D.Z., & Hugill, P. J. (2002). A GIS-based spatial analysis on neighborhood effects and voter turn-out: A case study in College Station, Texas. Political Geography, 21 (2), 159-173. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00054-3

  • Talen, E. (2000). Bottom-up GIS- A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (3), 279-294. doi:10.1080/01944360008976107

  • Thomas, C., & Humenik-Sappington, N. (2009). GIS for decision support and public policy making. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

  • Thomas, M.R. (2002). A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Land scape and Urban Planning, 58 (1), 7-23. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00229-8

  • Tsai, B.W., Chang, C. Y. D., Lin, C. C., & Lo, Y. C. (2006). Public participation geographic information system and indigenous society: New partnership of indigenous peoples in Taiwan. Geography Research Forum, 26 ,152-163.

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2003). (2003). What PPGIS really needs is… Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Public Participation geographic information Systems, Portland, OR. Retrieved from http://deathstar.rutgers.edu/ppgis/Tulloch.PPGIS.2003.htm

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? from vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4), 161-171. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1

  • Tulloch, D. L., & Shapiro, T. (2003). The intersection of data access and public participation: Impacting GIS users’ success? URISA Journal, 15 (APAII), 55-60.

  • Varenius Project (n.d.) Empowerment, marginalization and public participation GIS Retrieved from http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/ppgis/ncgia.html

  • Warren, S. (2004). The utopian potential of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 5-16. doi:10.3138/JW0L-3577-0J40-V3Q4

  • Weiner, D., Harris, T. M., & Craig, W. J. (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner(Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp.3-16). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Weiner, D., Warner, T. A., Harris, T. M., & Levin, R. M. (1995). Apartheid representations in a digital landscape: GIS, remote sensing and local knowledge in Kiepersol, South Africa. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 22 (1), 30-44. doi:10.1559/152304095782540537

  • Whitman, S., Silva, A., Shah, A., & Ansell, D. (2004). Diversity and disparity: GISand small-area analysis in six Chicago neighborhoods. Journal of Medical Systems, 28 (4), 397-411. doi:10.1023/B:JOMS.0000032854.99522.0d

  • Williams, C., & Dunn, C. E. (2003). GIS in participatory research: Assessing the impact of landmines on communities in north-west Cambodia. Transactions in GIS, 7 (3), 393-410. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00152

  • Wilson, M.W. (2011). Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding, and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (5), 857-872. doi:10.1068/d7910

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015a). New lines? enacting a social history of GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),29-34. doi:10.1111/cag.12118

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015b). Paying attention, digital media, and community-based critical GIS. Cultural Geographies, 22 (1), 177-192. doi:10.1177/1474474014539249

  • Wong, S., & Chua, Y. L. (2001). Data intermediation and beyond: Issues for web-based PPGIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for geographic information and Geovisualization, 38 (3-4), 63-80. doi:10.3138/K359-2M48-50K8-7565

  • Wridt, P. (2010). A qualitative GIS approach to mapping urban neighborhoods with children to promote physical activity and child-friendly community planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (1), 129-147. doi:10.1068/b35002

  • Wright, D.J., Duncan, S. L., & Lach, D. (2009). Social power and GIS technology: A review and assessment of approaches for natural resource management. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99 (2), 254-272. doi:10.1080/00045600802686299

  • Ye, Y., & Cromley, R. (2004). Database and design considerations for an online urban atlas. URISA Journal, 16 (1), 31-38.

  • Zhang, S. (2019). Public participation in the geoweb era: Defining a typology forgeo-participation in local governments. Cities, 85 , 38-50.doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.004

  • Zook, M.,Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered geographic information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2 (2), 6-32.doi:10.2202/1948-4682.1069

GIS History and Foundations

  • Bednarz, S. W., Bettis, N. C., Boehm, R. G., De Souza, A. R., Downs, R. M., Marran, J.F., . . . Salter, C. L. (1994). Geography for life: National geography standards, 1994. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Research & Exploration.

  • Brown, L.A. (1977). The story of maps. New York: Dover Publications.

  • Bunge, W. (1962). Theoretical geography. Lund, Sweden: Royal University of Lund and Gleerup Publishers.

  • Burtch, R.C. (2015). Property mapping: Property mapping in the United States and Canada.In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 1194-1200). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Calvert, C., Murray, K., & Smith, N. (1997). New technology and its impact on the framework for the world. In D. W. Rhind (Ed.), Framework for the world (pp.133-159). Cambridge: Pearson Professional.

  • Checkovitch, A. (2015). Land use map. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp.751-754). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Chrisman, N. (2005). Full circle: More than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 23-35. doi:10.3138/8U64-K7M1-5XW3-2677

  • Chrisman, N. R. (1998). Academic origins of GIS. In T. W. Foresman (Ed.), the history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the pioneers (pp.33-43). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Chrisman, N. R. (1999). What does ‘GIS’ mean? Transactions in GIS, 3 (2),175-186. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00014

  • Christman, N. R. (1987). Design of geographic information systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53 (10),1367-1370.

  • Clark, G.L. (1992). GIS — what crisis? Environment and Planning A, 24 (3),321-322.

  • Clark, M.J. (1998). GIS—Democracy or delusion? Environment and Planning A, 30 (2), 303-316. doi:10.1068/a300303

  • Clarke, K.C., & Cloud, J. G. (2000). On the origins of analytical cartography. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27 (3), 195-204. doi:10.1559/152304000783547821

  • Cloud, J. (2002). American cartographic transformations during the cold war. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (3), 261-282. doi:10.1559/152304002782008422

  • Couclelis, H. (1992). (1992). People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster vector debate in GIS. Paper presented at the International Conference GIS — from Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, Pisa, Italy. , 639 65-77. doi:10.1007/3-540-55966-3_3

  • Couclelis, H. (2004). The third domain: The spread and use of GIS within social science. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1),17-24. doi:10.3138/G54P-Q267-7148-3Q8P

  • Crampton, J. (1994). Cartography’s defining moment: The peters projection controversy,1974–1990. Cartographica, 31 (4), 16-32. doi:10.3138/1821-6811-L372-345P

  • Crampton, J. (2002). Maps, politics, and history. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 20 (6), 637-646. doi:10.1068/d2006c

  • Crampton, J. (2004). GIS and geographic governance: Reconstructing the choropleth map. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1),41-53. doi:10.3138/H066-3346-R941-6382

  • Crampton, J. W. (2010). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Curry, M.R. (1998). Digital places: Living with geographic information technologies. London: Routledge.

  • Dobson, J.E. (1983). Automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 35 (2),135-143. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1983.00135.x

  • Dobson, J.E. (1993). The geographic revolution: A retrospective on the age of automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 45 (4), 431-439.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00431.x

  • Dobson, J.E. (2015). Geographic information systems (GIS): GIS as an institutional revolution. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 492-495). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Edney, M. (1996). Theory and the history of cartography. Imago Mundi, 48 (1),185-191. doi:10.1080/03085699608592841

  • Edney, M. (2005). The origins and development of J. B. harley’s cartographic theories. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

  • Edney, M.H. (2015). Cartography and its discontents. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 50 (1),9-13. doi:10.3138/carto.50.1.02

  • Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies —emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (2), 256-263. doi:10.1177/0309132508094076

  • Fish, C., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Geographic information systems (GIS): GIS as a tool for map production. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century (pp. 504-510). Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Foresman, T. W. (1998a). GIS early years and the threads of evolution. In T. W. Foresman(Ed.), The history of geographic information systems: Perspectives from the pioneers (pp. 3-17). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Foresman, T. W. (Ed.). (1998b). The history of geographic information systems:Perspectives from the pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1987). A spatial analytical perspective on geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1 (4),327-334. doi:10.1080/02693798708927820

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1991). Just the facts. Political Geography Quarterly, 10 ,335-337. doi:10.1016/0260-9827(91)90001-B

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1992). Geographical information science. International Journal Of Geographical Information Systems, 6 (1), 31-45.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1995a). Geographic information systems and geographic research. In J.Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 31-50). New York: Guilford.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1995b). GIS and geographic research. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Groundtruth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp.31-50). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2006a). Geographical information science: Fifteen years later. In P.Fisher (Ed.), Classics from IJGIS: Twenty years of the International Journal of geographical information science and systems (pp. 199-204).Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2006b). GIScience ten years after ground truth. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 687-692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01022.x

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2009). Geographic information systems and science: Today and tomorrow. Annals of GIS, 15 (1), 3-9. doi:10.1080/19475680903250715

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2015). Two decades on: Critical GIScience since 1993. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1), 3-11.doi:10.1111/cag.12117

  • Harley, J.B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26 (2), 1-20.doi:10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53

  • Harley, J.B. (1990). Cartography, ethics and social theory. Cartographica, 27 (2),1-23. doi:10.3138/C211-1512-0603-XJ14

  • Harris, B. (1989). Beyond geographic information systems: Computers and the planning professional. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55 (1),85-90. doi:10.1080/01944368908975408

  • Harvey, F. (2000). The social construction of geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 711-713. doi:10.1080/136588100750022741

  • Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30 (9), 1683-1694. doi:10.1068/a301683

  • Heikkila, E. J. (1998). GIS is dead; long live GIS. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64 (3), 350-360. doi:10.1080/01944369808975991

  • Hinchliffe, S. (1996). Technology, power, and Space—The means and ends of geographies of technology. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (6), 659-682. doi:10.1068/d140659

  • Janelle, D. G., & Goodchild, M. F. (2011). Concepts, principles, tools, and challenges in spatially integrated social science. In T. L. Nyerges, H.Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp. 27-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Kirsch, S. (1995). The incredible shrinking world? technology and the production of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13 (5), 529-555. doi:10.1068/d130529

  • Lake, R.W. (1993). Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress in Human Geography, 17 (3),404-413. doi:10.1177/030913259301700309

  • MacGill, S. M. (1990). Commentary: GIS in the 1990s? Environment and Planning A, 22 (12), 1559-1560.

  • Martin, D. (1991). Geographic information systems and their socioeconomic applications. Andover: Capman and Hall.

  • McHaffie, P. (2000). Surfaces: Tacit knowledge, formal language, and metaphor at the harvard lab for computer graphics and spatial analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 755-773. doi:10.1080/136588100750022778

  • McHaffie, P. H. (1995). Manufacturing metaphors: Public cartography, the market, and democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 113-129). New York: Guilford Press.

  • McHaffie, P. H. (2002). Towards the automated map factory: Early automation at the U.S.geological survey. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (3), 193-206. doi:10.1559/152304002782008521

  • Monmonier, M. (1985). Technological transition in cartography. Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (Ed.). (2015). The history of cartography volume 6: Cartography in the twentieth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • NCGIA. (1996). GIS and society: The social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS — scientific report for the initiative 19 specialist meeting. (96-7). Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9bw2d2rw

  • NCGIA(n.d.). Initiative 19 origins. National Center for geographic information and Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.geo.wvu.edu/i19/origins/proposal.html

  • Nyerges, T. L. (1991). Geographic information abstractions: Conceptual clarity for Geographic modeling. Environment and Planning A, 23 (10),1483-1499. doi:10.1068/a231483

  • Nyerges, T. L., McMaster, R., & Couclelis, H. (2011). Geographic information systems and society: A twenty year research perspective. In T. L. Nyerges, H. Couclelis & R. McMaster (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of GIS and society (pp.3-22). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446201046.n1

  • Obermeyer, N. J. (1995). The hidden GIS technocracy. Cartography and geographic information Science, 22 (1), 78-83. doi:10.1559/152304095782540609

  • Openshaw, S. (1991). Commentary: A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put humpty-dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A, 23 (5), 621-628. doi:10.1068/a230621

  • Openshaw, S. (1992). Commentary: Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A reply. Environment and Planning A, 24 (4), 463-466.

  • Openshaw, S. (1998). Towards a more computationally minded scientific human geography. Environment and Planning A, 30 (2), 317-332.

  • Overton, M., & Taylor, P. J. (1991). Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A preemptive strike? Environment and Planning A, 23 (8),1087-1094.

  • Pickles, J. (1991). Geography, GIS and the surveillant society. Papers and Proceedings of Applied Geography Conferences, 14 , 80-91.

  • Pickles, J. (1992). Review of “geographic information systems and their socioeconomic applications”. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 10 , 597-606. doi:10.1068/d100597

  • Pickles, J. (1993). Discourse on method and the history of discipline: Reflections on dobson’s 1983 automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 45 (4),451-455. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00451.x

  • Pickles, J. (1995b). Representations in an electronic age: Geography, GIS, and democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 248). New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Pickles, J. (1997). Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (2), 363-372.doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00058

  • Pickles, J. (2006). Ground truth 1995–2005. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5),763-772. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01027.x

  • Pickles, J. (Ed.). (1995a). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Schulten, S. (2001). The geographical imagination in America 1880-1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Schulten, S. (2012). Mapping the nation: History and cartography in nineteenth-century America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Schuurman, N. (1999). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 36 (4), 11-22. doi:10.3138/U807-35K0-560M-0151

  • Schuurman, N. (2004). GIS: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Schuurman, N. (2009). The new brave new world: Geography, GIS, and the emergence of ubiquitous mapping and data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (4), 571-572. doi:10.1068/d3809

  • Sheppard, E. (1993). Automated geography: What kind of geography for what kind of society? The Professional Geographer, 45 (4), 457-460.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00457.x

  • Sheppard, E., Couclelis, H., Graham, S., Harrington, J. W., & Onsrud, H. (1999).Geographies of the information society. International Journal of geographical Information Science, 13 (8), 797-823. doi:10.1080/136588199241021

  • Smith, N. (1992). History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography, 16 (2), 257-271. doi:10.1177/030913259201600208

  • Sparke, M. (1998). A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88 (3), 463-495. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00109

  • Sui, D. Z. (2004). GIS, cartography, and the “third culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer age. The Professional Geographer, 56 (1),62. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601008.x

  • Taylor, P.J. (1990). Gks. Political Geography Quarterly, 9 (3), 211-212. doi:10.1016/0260-9827(90)90023-4

  • Tobler, W.R. (1959). Automation and cartography. Geographical Review, 49 (4),526-534.

  • Tomlinson, R. (1998). The canada geographic information system.In T. W. Foresman (Ed.), The history of geographic information systems:Perspectives from the pioneers (pp. 21-32). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015). New lines? Enacting a social history of GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),29-34. doi:10.1111/cag.12118

  • Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Wright, D.J., Goodchild, M. F., & Proctor, J. D. (1997). GIS: Tool or science? demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as “tool” versus “science”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (2), 346-362. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564374

  • Yapa, L.S. (1991). Is GIS appropriate technology? International Journal of geographical Information Systems, 5 (1), 41. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1303729539

Critical GIS

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014a). Do maps make geography? part 1:Redlining, planned shrinkage, and the places of decline. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 525-556.Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1036

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014b). Do maps make geography? part 2:Post-katrina new orleans, post-foreclosure cleveland and neoliberal urbanism. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 557-882.Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1038

  • Aalbers, M. B. (2014c). Do maps make geography? part 3:Reconnecting the trace. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13 (4), 586-588. Retrieved from https://www.acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1040

  • Aitken, S.C. (2002). Public participation, technological discourses and the scale of GIS.In W. J. Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 357-366).London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Aitken, S.C., & Craine, J. (2006, February 7,). Guest editorial: Affective geovisualizations. Directions Magazine, Retrieved from https://www.directionsmag.com/article/3015

  • Aitken, S.C., & Craine, J. (2009). Into the image and beyond: Affective visual geographies and GIScience. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed-methods approach (pp. 139-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Aitken, S.C., & Michel, S. M. (1995). Who contrives the real in GIS? geographic information, planning and critical theory. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 22 (1), 17-29. doi:10.1559/152304095782540519

  • Al-Kodmany, K. (2000). Public participation: Technology and democracy. Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), 53(4), 220-228. doi:10.1162/104648800564635

  • Ash, J. (2012). Technology, technicity, and emerging practices of temporal sensitivity in video games. Environment and Planning A, 44 (1), 187-203. doi:10.1068/a44171

  • Barnes, T.J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (2), 193-214. doi:10.1177/0309132509343728

  • Bell, S., & Reed, M. (2004). Adapting to the machine: Integrating GIS into qualitative research. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 55-66. doi:10.3138/Y413-1G62-6H6G-0L3Q

  • Bhagat, A., & Mogel, L. (Eds.). (2008). An atlas of radical cartography. Los Angeles: Journal of Aesthetics and Protest Press.

  • Bodenhamer, D. J., Corrigan, J., & Harris, T. M. (Eds.). (2010). The spatial humanities : GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  • Brown, M., & Knopp, L. (2006). Places or polygons? governmentality,scale, and the census in the gay and lesbian atlas. Population, Space and Place, 12 (4), 223-242. doi:10.1002/psp.410

  • Brown, M., & Knopp, L. (2008). Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (1), 40-58. doi:10.1080/00045600701734042

  • Bunge, W. (1971). Fitzgerald: Geography of a revolution. Cambridge, MA:Schenkman Publishers.

  • Bunge, W. (2011). In Heynen N., Barnes T. (Eds.), Fitzgerald: Geography of a revolution (Reprinted ed.). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

  • Bunge, W.W., & Bordessa, R. (1975). The Canadian alternative: Survival,expeditions, and urban change. Downsview, Ontario: York University.

  • Caquard, S. (2013). Cartography I. Progress in Human Geography, 37 (1),135-144. doi:10.1177/0309132511423796

  • Caquard, S. (2014). Cartography II. Progress in Human Geography, 38 (1),141-150. doi:10.1177/0309132513514005

  • Caquard, S. (2015). Cartography III. Progress in Human Geography, 39 (2),225-235. doi:10.1177/0309132514527039

  • Chrisman, N. (2005). Full circle: More than just social implications of GIS. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 23-35. doi:10.3138/8U64-K7M1-5XW3-2677

  • Chrisman, N. R. (1999). What does ‘GIS’ mean? Transactions in GIS, 3 (2),175-186. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00014

  • Christman, N. R. (1987). Design of geographic information systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53 (10),1367-1370.

  • Clark, G.L. (1992). GIS — what crisis? Environment and Planning A, 24 (3),321-322.

  • Clark, M.J. (1998). GIS—Democracy or delusion? Environment and Planning A, 30 (2), 303-316. doi:10.1068/a300303

  • Cope, M., & Elwood, S. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Cosgrove, D. (2008). Cultural cartography : maps and mapping in cultural geography. Annales de géographie, 660-661 (2),159. doi:10.3917/ag.660.0159

  • Cosgrove, D. E. (2003). Apollo’s eye: A cartographic genealogy of the earth in the western imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Couclelis, H. (1992). (1992). People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): Beyond the raster vector debate in GIS. Paper presented at the International Conference GIS — from Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, Pisa, Italy. , 639 65-77. doi:10.1007/3-540-55966-3_3

  • Couclelis, H. (2004). The third domain: The spread and use of GIS within social science. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1),17-24. doi:10.3138/G54P-Q267-7148-3Q8P

  • Crampton, J. W. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication and visualization. Progress in Human Geography, 25 (2), 235-252. doi:10.1191/030913201678580494

  • Crampton, J. W. (2003). The political mapping of cyberspace. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

  • Crampton, J. W. (2009). Cartography: Maps 2.0. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (1), 91-100. doi:10.1177/0309132508094074

  • Crampton, J. W. (2010). Mapping: A critical introduction to cartography and GIS. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Crampton, J. W. (2011). Cartographic calculations of territory. Progress in Human Geography, 35 (1), 92-103. doi:10.1177/0309132509358474

  • Crampton, J. W., & Krygier, J. (2006). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (1), 11-33.

  • Curry, M.R. (1995a). Rethinking rights and responsibilities in geographic information systems: Beyond the power of the image. Cartography and geographic information Science, 22 (1), 58-69. doi:10.1559/152304095782540573

  • Curry, M.R. (1995b). Geographic information systems and the inevitability of ethical inconsistency. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 68-87). New York:Guilford Press.

  • Curry, M.R. (1998). Digital places: Living with geographic information technologies. London: Routledge.

  • Curry, M.R. (1999). On the possibility of democracy in a geocoded world. Social Science Computer Review, 17 (10), 10-15. doi:10.1177/089443939901700102

  • Dobson, J.E. (1993). The geographic revolution: A retrospective on the age of automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 45 (4), 431-439.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00431.x

  • Dodds, K. (2000). Putting maps in their place: The demise of the Falkland Islands dependency survey and the mapping of Antarctica, 1945-1962. Ecumene, 7 (2),176-210. doi:10.1177/096746080000700203

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2001). Mapping cyberspace (Reprinted ed.).London: Routledge.

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). Codes of life: Identification codes and the machine-readable world. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23 (6), 851-881. doi:10.1068/d378t

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2007). ‘Outlines of a world coming into existence’:Pervasive computing and the ethics of forgetting. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (3), 431-445. doi:10.1068/b32041t

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2009). Software, objects, and home space. Environment and Planning A, 41 (6), 1344-1365. doi:10.1068/a4138

  • Dorling, D. (1998a). Human cartography: When is it good to map. Environment & Planning A, 30 , 277-288. doi:10.1068/a300277

  • Dorling, D. (1998b). Reacting to ground truth. Environment & Planning A, 30 , 289-301.

  • Elwood, S. (2006a). Beyond cooptation or resistance: Urban spatial politics, community organizations, and GIS-based spatial narratives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (2), 323-341.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00480.x

  • Elwood, S. (2006b). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 693-708. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x

  • Elwood, S. (2009). Geographic information science: New geovisualization technologies —emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography, 33 (2), 256-263. doi:10.1177/0309132508094076

  • Elwood, S. (2010). Thinking outside the box: Engaging critical geographic information systems theory, practice and politics in human geography. Geography Compass, 4 (1), 45-60. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00289.x

  • Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations,data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42 (1), 6-15.doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003

  • Esnard, A. (1998). Cities, GIS, and ethics. Journal of Urban Technology, 5 (3),33-45. doi:10.1080/10630739883822

  • Fielding, N., & Cisneros-Puebla, C. A. (2009). CAQDAS-GIS convergence: Toward a new integrated mixed method research practice? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3 (4), 349-370. doi:10.1177/1558689809344973

  • Galloway, A. (2004). Intimations of everyday life: Ubiquitous computing and the city. Cultural Studies, 18 (2-3), 384-408. doi:10.1080/0950238042000201572

  • Garfield, S. (2013). On the map: A mind-expanding exploration of the way the world looks. New York: Gotham Books.

  • Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39 (8), 1961-1980. doi:10.1068/a38247

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1987). A spatial analytical perspective on geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 1 (4),327-334. doi:10.1080/02693798708927820

  • Goodchild, M. F. (1995). GIS and geographic research. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Groundtruth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp.31-50). New York: Guilford Press.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2006a). GIScience ten years after ground truth. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 687-692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01022.x

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2006b). Geographical information science: Fifteen years later. In P.Fisher (Ed.), Classics from IJGIS: Twenty years of the International Journal of geographical information science and systems (pp. 199-204).Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4),211-221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Janelle, D. G. (2010). Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75 (1), 3-13. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9340-3

  • Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals. Progress in Development Studies, 11 (3), 211-227. doi:10.1177/146499341001100303

  • Graham, S. (1998a). The end of geography or the explosion of place? conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22 (2), 165-185. doi:10.1191/030913298671334137

  • Graham, S. (1998b). Spaces of surveillant simulation: New technologies, digital representations, and material geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 16 (4), 483-504. doi:10.1068/d160483

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the city:Electronic spaces, urban places. London: Routledge.

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2003). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. New York: Routledge.

  • Graham, S., & Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space,inequity. Critical Social Policy, 23 (2), 227-248.

  • Hannah, M.G. (2008). Mapping the under-scrutinized: The west german census boycott movement of 1987 and the dangers of information-based security.In D. Z. Sui (Ed.), Geospatial technologies and homeland security (pp.301-314). New York: Springer.

  • Harris, L., & Harrower, M. (2005). Critical interventions and lingering concerns : Critical cartography/GISci, social theory, and alternative possible futures.ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (1), 1-10. doi:10.14288/1.0357972

  • Harvey, D. (2001). Cartographic identities: Geographical knowledges under globalization. In Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography (pp.208-235). New York: Routledge.

  • Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30 (9), 1683-1694. doi:10.1068/a301683

  • Harvey, F., Kwan, M., & Pavlovskaya, M. (2005). Introduction: Critical GIS. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 1-4. doi:10.3138/04L6-2314-6068-43V6

  • Hazen, H.D., & Harris, L. (2005). Power of maps : (Counter)mapping for conservation. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (1), 99-130. doi:10.14288/1.0357973

  • Heikkila, E. J. (1998). GIS is dead; long live GIS. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64 (3), 350-360. doi:10.1080/01944369808975991

  • Hillis, K. (1996). A geography of the eye: The technologies of virtual reality. In R. M.Shields (Ed.), Cultures of internet: Virtual spaces, real histories,living bodies (). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Hinchliffe, S. (1996). Technology, power, and Space—The means and ends of geographies of technology. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (6), 659-682. doi:10.1068/d140659

  • Huxley, M. (2006). Spatial rationalities: Order, environment, evolution and government. Social & Cultural Geography, 7 (5), 771-787. doi:10.1080/14649360600974758

  • Johnson, J. T., Louis, R. P., & Pramono, A. H. (2005). Facing the future:Encouraging critical cartographic literacies in indigenous communities. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4 (4), 80-98.

  • Kar, B.,Crowsey, R. C., & Zale, J. J. (2013). The myth of location privacy in the United States: Surveyed attitude versus current practices. The Professional Geographer, 65 (1), 47-64. doi:10.1080/00330124.2012.658725

  • Kirby, K.M. (1996). Re: Mapping subjectivity: Cartographic vision and the limits of politics. In N. Duncan (Ed.), BodySpace: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality (). New York:Routledge.

  • Kirsch, S. (1995). The incredible shrinking world? technology and the production of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13 (5), 529-555. doi:10.1068/d130529

  • Kitchin, R. (2008). The practices of mapping. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 43 (3),211-215. doi:10.3138/carto.43.3.211

  • Kitchin, R. M. (1998). Towards geographies of cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography, 22 (3), 385-406. doi:10.1191/030913298668331585

  • Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2005). Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95 (1), 162-180.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00454.x

  • Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2007). Rethinking maps. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (3), 331-344. doi:10.1177/0309132507077082

  • Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2009). Grounded visualization and scale: A recursive analysis of community spaces. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed-methods approach (pp. 95-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Krygier, J. B. (2002). A praxis of public participation GIS and visualization. In W. J.Craig, T. M. Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 330-341). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Kwan, M. (2002a). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (4), 645-661. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00309

  • Kwan, M. (2002b). Introduction: Feminist geography and GIS. Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3), 261-262. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003860

  • Kwan, M. (2002c). Is GIS for women? reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3),271-279. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003888

  • Kwan, M., & Ding, G. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer, 60 (4), 443-465. doi:10.1080/00330120802211752

  • Kwan, M., & Knigge, L. (2006). Doing qualitative research using GIS: An oxymoronic endeavor? Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 1999-2002. doi:10.1068/a38462

  • Kwan, M.,Janelle, D. G., & Goodchild, M. F. (2003). Accessibility in space and time:A theme in spatially integrated social science. Journal of Geographical Systems, 5 (1), 1-3. doi:10.1007/s101090300100

  • Laituri, M. (2002). Ensuring access to GIS for marginal societies. In W. J. Craig, T. M.Harris & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 270-282). London: Taylor and Francis.

  • Lake, R.W. (1993). Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress in Human Geography, 17 (3),404-413. doi:10.1177/030913259301700309

  • Leszczynski, A. (2012). Situating the geoweb in political economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (1), 72-89. doi:10.1177/0309132511411231

  • Louis, R.P., Johnson, J. T., & Pramono, A. H. (2012). Introduction: Indigenous cartographies and counter-mapping. Cartographica, 47 (2),77-79. doi:10.3138/carto.47.2.77

  • Ma thews, S. A., Detwiler, J. E., & Burton, L. M. (2005). Geo-ethnography: Coupling geographic information analysis techniques with ethnographic methods in urban research. Cartographica: The International Journal for geographic information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 75-90. doi:10.3138/2288-1450-W061-R664

  • MacGill, S. M. (1990). Commentary: GIS in the 1990s? Environment and Planning A, 22 (12), 1559-1560.

  • McCormack, D. P. (2010). Remotely sensing affective afterlives: The spectral geographies of material remains. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100 (3), 640-654. doi:10.1080/00045601003795004

  • McHaffie, P. (1997). Decoding the globe: Globalism, advertising, and corporate practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15 (1), 73-86. doi:10.1068/d150073

  • McHaffie, P. (2000). Surfaces: Tacit knowledge, formal language, and metaphor at the harvard lab for computer graphics and spatial analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (8), 755-773. doi:10.1080/136588100750022778

  • McHaffie, P. H. (1995). Manufacturing metaphors: Public cartography, the market, and democracy. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 113-129). New York: Guilford Press.

  • McHaffie, P. H. (2002). Towards the automated map factory: Early automation at the U.S.geological survey. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 29 (3), 193-206. doi:10.1559/152304002782008521

  • Miller, C.C. (2006). A beast in the field: The google maps mashup as GIS/2. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 41 (3), 187-199. doi:10.3138/J0L0-5301-2262-N779

  • Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of bits: Space, place, and the infobahn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (1991). How to lie with maps (1st ed.).Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (1995). Drawing the line: Tales of maps and cartocontroversy. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

  • Monmonier, M. (1996). How to lie with maps (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2000). Webcams, interactive index maps, and our brave new world’s brave new globe. Cartographic Perspectives, 37 , 51-64.doi:10.14714/CP37.809

  • Monmonier, M. (2001). Bushmanders and bullwinkles : How politicians manipulate electronic maps and census data to win elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2002). Spying with maps: Surveillance technologies and the future of privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2006). From squaw tit to whorehouse meadow: How maps name, claim,and inflame. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2007). Cartography: The multidisciplinary pluralism of cartographic art,geospatial technology, and empirical scholarship. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (3), 371-379. doi:10.1177/0309132507077089

  • Monmonier, M. (2010). No dig, no fly, no go: How maps restrict and control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (2017). Patents and cartographic inventions: A new perspective for map history. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Monmonier, M. (2018). How to lie with maps (3rd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press

  • Moss, P. (1995). Embeddedness in practice, numbers in context: The politics of knowing and doing. The Professional Geographer, 47 (4), 442-449.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00442.x

  • Nellis, M.D. (2005). Geospatial information technology, rural resource development, and future geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95 (1), 1-10. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00447.x

  • NPA Project. (2011). Notes for a people’s atlas: People making maps of their cities. Chicago, IL: AREA Chicago.

  • O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Geographical information science: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30 (6), 783-791. doi:10.1177/0309132506071528

  • Obermeyer, N. J. (1995). The hidden GIS technocracy. Cartography and geographic information Science, 22 (1), 78-83. doi:10.1559/152304095782540609

  • Openshaw, S. (1991). Commentary: A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put humpty-dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A, 23 (5), 621-628. doi:10.1068/a230621

  • Openshaw, S. (1992). Commentary: Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A reply. Environment and Planning A, 24 (4), 463-466.

  • Overton, M., & Taylor, P. J. (1991). Further thoughts on geography and GIS: A preemptive strike? Environment and Planning A, 23 (8),1087-1094.

  • Paglen, T. (2009). Experimental geography: From cultural production to the production of space. In N. Thompson, & Independent Curators International (Eds.), Experimental geography: Radical approaches to landscape, cartography and urbanism. New York: Melville House.

  • Pavlovskaya, M. (2009). Critical GIS and its positionality. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44 (1),8-10.

  • Pavlovskaya, M. E. (2002). Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3), 281-289. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003897

  • Pavlovskaya, M., & St. Martin, K. (2007). Feminism and geographic information systems: From a missing object to a mapping subject. Geography Compass, 1 (3),583-606. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00028.x

  • Perkins, C. (2009). Playing with maps. In M. Dodge, R. Kitchin & C. Perkins(Eds.), Rethinking maps (pp. 167-188). London: Routledge.

  • Pickles, J. (1986). Bibliography of propaganda maps. Bulletin – Special Libraries Association, Geography & Map Division, 146 , 1-7.

  • Pickles, J. (1993). Discourse on method and the history of discipline: Reflections on dobson’s 1983 automated geography. The Professional Geographer, 45 (4),451-455. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00451.x

  • Pickles, J. (1997). Tool or science? GIS, technoscience, and the theoretical turn. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (2), 363-372.doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00058

  • Pickles, J. (2006). Ground truth 1995–2005. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5),763-772. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01027.x

  • Pickles, J. (Ed.). (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Poore, B.S., & Chrisman, N. R. (2006). Order from noise: Toward a social theory of geographic information. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (3), 508-523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00703.x

  • Powell, R.C. (2007). Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (3), 309-329. doi:10.1177/0309132507077081

  • Pratt, G. (1996). Trashing and its alternatives. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14 (3), 253-256. doi:10.1068/d140253

  • Ramsey, K. (2008). A call for agonism: GIS and the politics of collaboration. Environment and Planning A, 40 (10), 2346-2363. doi:10.1068/a4028

  • Rinner, C. (2001). Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (6), 847-863. doi:10.1068/b2748t

  • Rose-Redwood, R. S. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30 (4), 469-486. doi:10.1191/0309132506ph619oa

  • Roth, R.E. (2009). A qualitative approach to understanding the role of geographic information uncertainty during decision making. Cartography and geographic Information Science, 36 (4), 315-330. doi:10.1559/152304009789786326

  • Rundstrom, R. A. (1995). GIS, indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 22 (1), 45-57. doi:10.1559/152304095782540564

  • Schuurman, N. (1999a). Critical GIS: Theorizing an emerging science. Cartographica, 36 (4),7. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1437841918

  • Schuurman, N. (1999b). Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 36 (4), 11-22. doi:10.3138/U807-35K0-560M-0151

  • Schuurman, N. (2002). Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 46 (3), 258-265.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00748.x

  • Schuurman, N. (2004a). Databases and bodies: A cyborg update. Environment and Planning A, 36 (8), 1337-1340. doi:10.1068/a3608_b

  • Schuurman, N. (2004b). GIS: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

  • Schuurman, N. (2005a). Social dimensions of object definition in GIS. In P. Fisher, &D. Unwin (Eds.), Re-presenting GIS (pp. 27-42). Malden, MA:Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Schuurman, N. (2005b). Social perspectives on semantic interoperability: Constraints on geographical knowledge from a data perspective. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4),47-61. doi:10.3138/9643-114R-7787-5253

  • Schuurman, N. (2006). Formalization matters: Critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96 (4), 726-739.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00513.x

  • Schuurman, N. (2009a). Is the rubric “critical GIScience” effective? an argument for theoretical GIScience. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44 (1), 10-11.

  • Schuurman, N. (2009b). Metadata as a site for imbuing GIS with qualitative information. InM. Cope, & S. Elwood (Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp. 41-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Schuurman, N. (2009c). The new brave new world: Geography, GIS, and the emergence of ubiquitous mapping and data. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27 (4), 571-572. doi:10.1068/d3809

  • Schuurman, N. (2015). What is alt.gis? introduction to thespecial issue. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),1-2. doi:10.1111/cag.12163

  • Schuurman, N., & Kwan, M. (2004). Guest editorial: Taking a walk on the social side of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 1-3. doi:10.3138/K3J7-6171-J4K0-868J

  • Schuurman, N., & Leszczynski, A. (2006). Ontology‐Based metadata. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5), 709-726. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01024.x

  • Shannon, J., & Walker, K. (2018). Opening GIScience: A process-based approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32 (10), 1911-1926.doi:10.1080/13658816.2018.1464167

  • Sheppard, E. (1993). Automated geography: What kind of geography for what kind of society? The Professional Geographer, 45 (4), 457-460.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00457.x

  • Sheppard, E. (1995). GIS and society: Towards a research agenda. Cartography and geographic Information Science, 22 (1), 5-16. doi:10.1559/152304095782540555

  • Sheppard, E. (2005). Knowledge production through critical GIS: Genealogy and prospects. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 5-21. doi:10.3138/GH27-1847-QP71-7TP7

  • Sheppard, E., Couclelis, H., Graham, S., Harrington, J. W., & Onsrud, H. (1999).Geographies of the information society. International Journal of geographical Information Science, 13 (8), 797-823. doi:10.1080/136588199241021

  • Sieber, R.E. (2004). Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 25-39.doi:10.3138/T6U8-171M-452W-516R

  • Smith, N. (1992). History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography, 16 (2), 257-271. doi:10.1177/030913259201600208

  • Sparke, M. (1998). A map that roared and an original atlas: Canada, cartography, and the narration of nation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88 (3), 463-495. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00109

  • St.Martin, K. (2009). Toward a cartography of the commons: Constituting the political and economic possibilities of place. The Professional Geographer, 61 (4), 493-507. doi:10.1080/00330120903143482

  • St.Martin, K., & Wing, J. (2007). The discourse and discipline of GIS. Cartographica:The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 42 (3), 235-248. doi:10.3138/carto.42.3.235

  • Stonich, S. C. (1998). Information technologies, advocacy, and development: Resistance and backlash to industrial shrimp farming. Cartography and geographic information Science, 25 (2), 113-122. doi:10.1559/152304098782594544

  • Sui, D. Z. (2004). GIS, cartography, and the “third culture”: Geographic imaginations in the computer age. The Professional Geographer, 56 (1),62. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05601008.x

  • Sui, D. Z. (2010). GeoJournal: A new focus on spatially integrated social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal, 75 (1), 1-2. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9341-2

  • Taylor, P.J. (1990). Gks. Political Geography Quarterly, 9 (3), 211-212. doi:10.1016/0260-9827(90)90023-4

  • Thompson, G. (2003). New media technologies: Weblogs, warblogs, the public sphere, andbubbles. Transformations, 7

  • Wilson, M. W., Poore, B. S., Harvey, F., Kwan, M., O’Sullivan, D., Pavlovskaya, M., . .. Sheppard, E. (2009). Theory, practice, and history in critical GIS: Reports on an AAG panel session. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 44 (1), 5-16.doi:10.3138/carto.44.1.5

  • Wilson, M.W. (2009a). Cyborg geographies: Towards hybrid epistemologies. Gender,Place & Culture, 16 (5), 499-516. doi:10.1080/09663690903148390

  • Wilson, M.W. (2009b). Towards a genealogy of qualitative GIS. In M. Cope, & S. Elwood(Eds.), Qualitative GIS: A mixed methods approach (pp.156-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Wilson, M.W. (2011a). Data matter(s): Legitimacy, coding, and qualifications-of-life. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29 (5), 857-872. doi:10.1068/d7910

  • Wilson, M.W. (2011b). ‘Training the eye’: Formation of the geocoding subject. Social & Cultural Geography, 12 (4), 357-376.doi:10.1080/14649365.2010.521856

  • Wilson, M.W. (2012). Location-based services, conspicuous mobility, and the location-aware future. Geoforum, 43 (6), 1266-1275.doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.014

  • Wilson, M.W. (2017). New lines: Critical GIS and trouble of the map. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Wood, D. (2010). Rethinking the power of maps. New York: The Guilford Press.

  • Wright, D.J., Goodchild, M. F., & Proctor, J. D. (1997). GIS: Tool or science? demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as “tool” versus “science”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (2), 346-362. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564374

  • Yapa, L.S. (1991). Is GIS appropriate technology? International Journal of geographical Information Systems, 5 (1), 41. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1303729539

  • Zook, M.A., & Graham, M. (2007a). The creative reconstruction of the internet:Google and the privatization of cyberspace and DigiPlace. Geoforum, 38 (6),1322-1343. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.004

  • Zook, M.A., & Graham, M. (2007b). Mapping DigiPlace: Geocoded internet data and the representation of place. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (3), 466-482. doi:10.1068/b3311

Volunteered Geographic Information and Neogeography

  • Adams, P.C. (2009). Geographies of media and communication: A critical introduction. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Boulton, A. (2010). Just maps: Google’s democratic map-making community. Cartographica, 45 (1),1-4. doi:10.3138/carto.45.1.1

  • Doan, A.,Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54 (4), 86-96. doi:10.1145/1924421.1924442

  • Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2013). Crowdsourced cartography: Mapping experience and knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 45 (1), 19-36. doi:10.1068/a44484

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),173-183. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9186-0

  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012a). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (3),571-590. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.595657

  • Elwood, S., Goodchild, M., & Sui, D. (2012b). Prospects for VGI research and the emerging fourth paradigm. In D. Sui, S. Elwood & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowd sourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information in theory and practice (pp.361-375). New York: Springer.

  • Flanigan, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4), 137-148. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9188-y

  • Goodchild, M. (2009). NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise. Journal of Location Based Services, 3 (2), 82-96. doi:10.1080/17489720902950374

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69 (4),211-221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2008). Commentary: Whither VGI? GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),239-244. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9190-4

  • Graham, M. (2010). Neogeography and the palipsests of place: Web 2.0 and the construction of a virtual earth. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 101 (4), 422-436.

  • Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37 (4), 682-703. doi:10.1068/b35097

  • Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratisation. Environment And Planning A, 45 (1), 55-69. doi:10.1068/a45184

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2 (6), 2011-2039.doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x

  • Hardy, D.,Frew, J., & Goodchild, M. F. (2012). Volunteered geographic information production as a spatial process. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (7), 1191-1212.doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.629618

  • Hecht, B., & Stephens, M. (2014). (2014). A tale of cities: Urban biases in volunteered geographic information. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Leszczynski, A. (2014). On the neo in neogeography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104 (1), 60-79. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.846159

  • Leszczynski, A., & Elwood, S. (2015). Feminist geographies of new spatial media. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1), 12-28.doi:10.1111/cag.12093

  • Levental, S. (2012). A new geospatial services framework: How disaster preparedness efforts should integrate neogeography. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries: Advances in Geospatial Information Collections and Archives, 8 (2),134-162. doi:10.1080/15420353.2012.670084

  • Lin, W. (2012). When web 2.0 meets public participation GIS (PPGIS): VGI and spaces of participatory mapping in china. In D. Sui, S. Elwood & M. Goodchild(Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information in theory and practice (pp. 83-103). London: Springer.

  • Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. New York: Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.

  • McCall, M.K., Martinez Martin, J., & Verplanke, J. J. (2015). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: Learning from PGIS. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 14 (3), 791-826.

  • Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Social communication in the twitter age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Peterson, M. (2003). Foundations of research in internet cartography: Contemporary limits and possibilities. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Maps and the internet (pp.437-445). New York: Elsevier.

  • Peterson, M. P. (Ed.). (2003). Maps and the internet. Oxford: Elsevier.

  • Russell, M. A. (2011a). 21 recipes for mining twitter. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

  • Russell, M. A. (2011b). Mining the social web. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

  • Schmidt, M., & Weiser, P. (2012). Web mapping services: Development and trends. In M. Peterson (Ed.), Online maps with APIs and web services (pp.13-21). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  • Seeger, C.J. (2008). The role of facilitated volunteered geographic information in the landscape planning and site design process. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),199-213. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9184-2

  • Shepherd, H. (2012). Crowdsourcing. Contexts, 11 (2), 10-11. doi:10.1177/1536504212446453

  • Stephens, M. (2013). Gender and the GeoWeb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, 78 (6), 981-996. doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9492-z

  • Sui, D.,Elwood, S., & Goodchild, M. (Eds.). (2012). Crowd sourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. New York: Springer.

  • Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? from vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4), 161-171. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9185-1

  • Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

  • Wilson, M., & Graham, M. (2013). Neogeography and volunteered geographic information: A conversation with michael goodchild and andrew turner. Environment and Planning A, 45 (1), 10-18. doi:10.1068/a44483

  • Wilson, M.W., & Graham, M. (2013). Situating neogeography: Guest editorial. Environment and Planning A, 45 (1), 3-9. doi:10.1068/a44482

Historical GIS (HGIS)

  • Bonnell, J., & Fortin, M. (2014). Historical GIS research in Canada. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.

  • DeBats, D.A., & Gregory, I. N. (2011). Introduction to historical GIS and the study of urban history. Social Science History, 35 (4), 455-463. doi:10.1215/01455532-1381814

  • Gregory, I. N., & Geddes, A. (Eds.). (2014). Toward spatial humanities : Historical GIS and spatial history. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  • Gregory, I. N., & Healey, R. G. (2007). Historical GIS: Structuring, mapping and analysing geographies of the past. Progress in Human Geography, 31 (5),638-653. doi:10.1177/0309132507081495

  • Gregory, I. N., DeBats, D., & Lafreniere, D. (Eds.). (2018). The routledge companion to spatial history. New York: Routledge.

  • Harris, T., Bergeron, S., & Rouse, L. J. (2011). Humanities GIS: Place, spatial storytelling, and immersive visualization in the humanities. In M. Dear, J. Ketchum, S. Luria & D. Richardson (Eds.), GeoHumanities: Art, history, text at the edge of place (pp. 226-240). London: Routledge.

  • Hillier, A. (2010). Invitation to mapping: How GIS can facilitate new discoveries in urban and planning history. Journal of Planning History, 9 (2),122-134. doi:10.1177/1538513210366964

  • Hillier, A. (2011). Teaching race and history with historical GIS: Lessons from mapping the du bois philadelphia negro. In M. Dear, J.Ketchum, S. Luria & D. Richardson (Eds.), GeoHumanities: Art,history, text at the edge of place (pp. 277-286). London: Routledge.

  • Knowles, A. K. (2002). Past time, past place: GIS for history. Redlands, CA:ESRI Press.

  • Knowles, A. K. (2005). Emerging trends in historical GIS. Historical Geography, 33 , 7-13.

  • Knowles, A. K. (2014). The contested nature of historical GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28 (1), 206-211.doi:10.1080/13658816.2013.850696

  • Knowles, A. K. (2016). Historical geographic information systems and social science history. Social Science History, 40 (4), 741-750.doi:10.1017/ssh.2016.29

  • Mojica, L., Gregory, I. N., & Martí-Henneberg, J. (2013). A method for exploring long-term urban change using national historical GIS databases. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 46 (2),90-101. doi:10.1080/01615440.2012.721720

  • Rumsey, D., & Williams, M. (2002). Historical maps in GIS. In A. K. Knowles(Ed.), Past time, past place: GIS for history (pp. 1-18). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

Feminist GIS

  • Bagheri, N. (2014). What qualitative GIS maps tell and don’t tell: Insights from mapping women in tehran’s public spaces. Journal of Cultural Geography, 31 (2), 166-178. doi:10.1080/08873631.2014.906848

  • Barnes, T.J., & Sheppard, E. (2010). ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34 (2), 193-214. doi:10.1177/0309132509343728

  • Bell, S., & Reed, M. (2004). Adapting to the machine: Integrating GIS into qualitative research. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 55-66. doi:10.3138/Y413-1G62-6H6G-0L3Q

  • Brown, M., & Knopp, L. (2008). Queering the map: The productive tensions of colliding epistemologies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98 (1), 40-58. doi:10.1080/00045600701734042

  • Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Future research directions motivated by critical, participatory, and feminist GIS. GeoJournal, 72 (3/4),173-183. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9186-0

  • Gieseking, J. J. (2018a). Operating anew: Queering GIS with good enough software. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 62 (1), 55-66.doi:10.1111/cag.12397

  • Gieseking, J. J. (2018b). Where are we? The method of mapping with GIS in digital humanities. American Quarterly, 70 (3),641-648. doi:10.1353/aq.2018.0047

  • Gilbert, M. R., & Masucci, M. (2006). The implications of including women’s daily lives in a feminist GIScience. Transactions in GIS, 10 (5),751-761. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01026.x

  • Hong, J.E. (2016). The influence of feminist theory and perspectives on GIS research. Geography, 101 (1),42. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1776777237

  • Knigge, L., & Cope, M. (2006). Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A, 38 (11), 2021-2037. doi:10.1068/a37327

  • Kwan, M. (2002a). Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92 (4), 645-661. doi:10.1111/1467-8306.00309

  • Kwan, M. (2002b). Introduction: Feminist geography and GIS. Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3), 261-262. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003860

  • Kwan, M. (2002c). Is GIS for women? reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place & Culture, 9 (3),271-279. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003888

  • Kwan, M. (2007). Affecting geospatial technologies: Toward a feminist politics of emotion. The Professional Geographer, 59 (1), 22-34.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00588.x

  • Leszczynski, A., & Elwood, S. (2015). Feminist geographies of new spatial media. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1), 12-28.doi:10.1111/cag.12093

  • Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Amherst: Center for International Education.

  • McLafferty, S. (2005). Women and GIS: Geospatial technologies and feminist geographies. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 40 (4), 37-45. doi:10.3138/1341-21JT-4P83-1651

  • McLafferty, S. L. (2002). Mapping women’s worlds: Knowledge, power and the bounds of GIS. Gender,Place & Culture, 9 (3), 263-269. doi:10.1080/0966369022000003879

  • Moss, P. (1995). Embeddedness in practice, numbers in context: The politics of knowing and doing. The Professional Geographer, 47 (4), 442-449.doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00442.x

  • O’Sullivan, D., Bergmann, L., & Thatcher, J. E. (2018). Spatiality, maps, and mathematics in critical human geography: Toward a repetition with difference. The Professional Geographer, 70 (1), 129-139.doi:10.1080/00330124.2017.1326081

  • Pavlovskaya, M., & St. Martin, K. (2007). Feminism and geographic information systems: From a missing object to a mapping subject. Geography Compass, 1 (3),583-606. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00028.x

  • Schuurman, N. (2002). Women and technology in geography: A cyborg manifesto for GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 46 (3), 258-265.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.2002.tb00748.x

  • Schuurman, N. (2004). Databases and bodies: A cyborg update. Environment and Planning A, 36 (8), 1337-1340. doi:10.1068/a3608_b

  • Sieber, R.E. (2004). Rewiring for a GIS/2. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 25-39.doi:10.3138/T6U8-171M-452W-516R

  • Warren, S. (2004). The utopian potential of GIS. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39 (1), 5-16. doi:10.3138/JW0L-3577-0J40-V3Q4

  • Wilson, M.W. (2009). Cyborg geographies: Towards hybrid epistemologies. Gender, Place & Culture, 16 (5), 499-516. doi:10.1080/09663690903148390

  • Wilson, M.W. (2015). New lines? Enacting a social history of GIS. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien, 59 (1),29-34. doi:10.1111/cag.12118

Textbooks

  • Bolstad, P. (2016). GIS fundamentals: A first text on geographic information systems. (5th ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: XanEdu Publishing.

  • Brunn, S.D., Cutter, S. L., & Harrington Jr., J. W. (Eds.). (2004). Geography and technology. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • DeMers, M.N. (2009). Fundamentals of geographic information systems (4th ed.). Malden, MA: John Wiley and Sons.

  • DiBiase, D., DeMers, M., Johnson, A., Kemp, K., Luck, A. T., Plewe, B., . . . Wentz, E. (2006). Geographic information science & technology body of knowledge (1st ed.). Washington, DC:Association of American Geographers.

  • Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.).Malden, MA: Wiley.

  • Maantay, J., & Ziegler, J. (2009). GIS for the urban environment. Redlands, CA: Esri Press

  • Mitchell, A. (2001). The esri guide to GIS analysis volume 1: Geographic patterns and relationships. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.

  • Mitchell, A. (2012). The esri guide to GIS analysis volume 3: Modeling suitability, movement, and interaction. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.

  • Monmonier, M. (1993). Mapping it out: Expository cartography for the humanities and social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Schuurman, N. (2009a). Geographic information science (GISc). In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed., ). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Schuurman, N. (2009b). Geographic information systems (GIS). In D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts & S. Whatmore (Eds.), The dictionary of Human Geography (5th ed., ). Malden, MA:Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Tyner, J.A. (2010). Principles of map design. New York: The Guilford Press.